Fmr. Trump Official: Harris Ignoring Trump’s Attacks is “Smart Political Instinct”
In the high-stakes arena of American politics, where every move is scrutinized and debated, Vice President Kamala Harris has opted for a calculated approach in dealing with former President Donald Trump’s repeated attacks on her racial identity. According to a former Trump administration official, Harris’ decision to sidestep these provocations reflects “smart political instinct.”
Over the years, Donald Trump has made headlines with his blunt, often inflammatory rhetoric, particularly when addressing political figures of color. Harris, a woman of mixed Black and South Asian descent, has been no stranger to these attacks. However, rather than engaging in a war of words, the Vice President has chosen a different path: silence. This decision, according to the former Trump official, is not one of weakness but of tactical restraint.
By refraining from engaging directly with Trump's provocations, Harris demonstrates a keen awareness of the political landscape. Responding to Trump’s barbs would inevitably feed into his narrative and possibly distract from her own policy goals and messages. Instead, Harris remains focused on her role as Vice President, avoiding the pitfalls of an identity-based debate that could dominate the headlines and fuel more misinformation.
The Trump administration official pointed out that Trump’s attacks often serve a dual purpose: rallying his base while attempting to bait opponents into public spats that play out across the media. For many Trump supporters, claims of racism are not viewed as damning but rather as further evidence of the establishment’s attempts to undermine their cause. In such a climate, responding to the accusations can backfire, drawing attention away from more pressing political matters.
Harris’ refusal to engage in these debates allows her to stay focused on her duties and portray herself as a leader above the fray. This strategy also prevents her from falling into the “identity trap,” where political opponents attempt to reduce her to a singular narrative based solely on her race and gender.
Recent data shows a significant rise in voter engagement, particularly among Black and Latina women. Voter registration among these groups has surged by over 500%, presenting an opportunity for Democrats to solidify their base. However, this rise in voter turnout among minority women contrasts with some shifting sentiments among younger men of color, particularly Black and Latino men.
For these voters, the increasing focus on gender and identity politics has left some feeling disconnected from the Democratic Party’s messaging. While Harris’ identity is a source of pride for many, it’s not the defining factor for her entire voter base. Her calculated silence allows her to maintain relatability across a broader spectrum of voters who may not want to see identity politics at the center of every political conversation.
In recent years, many corporations and institutions have scaled back on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, signaling a broader cultural shift. This retreat from DEI initiatives, coupled with the rise of anti-woke sentiment, has created a delicate balancing act for politicians like Harris, who must navigate these cultural undercurrents without alienating key voter demographics.
The Trump official acknowledges that Harris' avoidance of Trump’s racial provocations allows her to focus on broader, more inclusive messaging. By emphasizing her background as the daughter of hardworking, middle-class Americans, she appeals to voters' economic concerns, a key issue that cuts across racial lines.
As the nation gears up for the next election cycle, Harris’ approach may become a defining feature of how Democrats engage with Trump and his supporters. Her ability to stay on message, avoid being pigeonholed by identity politics, and connect with voters on economic issues shows a nuanced understanding of the electorate.
Check Our Channel >>> CLICK HERE <<<
This strategic silence—what the former Trump official calls "smart political instinct"—demonstrates that in today’s political climate, sometimes the best response is no response at all. By choosing not to engage in Trump’s attacks, Harris can focus on policy, building coalitions, and shaping her legacy in a way that transcends the inflammatory rhetoric of the moment.
Ultimately, Harris’ restraint could prove to be a powerful tool in a political landscape where every word is amplified, and every response is scrutinized. Whether this strategy will continue to pay off remains to be seen, but for now, it has allowed her to rise above the fray and focus on the broader challenges facing the nation.
.jpeg)
